News & Topics

In the realm of software quality assurance, two terms often come up: "exploratory testing" and "ad hoc testing." These approaches play a pivotal role in the pursuit of delivering high-quality software. As the owner of "Quality Professionals," it's crucial to understand these testing methodologies, the types of bugs they uncover, the tools they employ, and the associated testing metrics. In this article, we'll delve deep into exploratory testing vs. ad-hoc testing, demystify QA expertise, explore various software bugs, discuss testing tools, and shed light on testing metrics. Let's embark on this journey to enhance your understanding of software quality assurance. Quality Assurance Expertise: The Foundation In this section, we emphasize the critical role of Quality Assurance (QA) expertise in software development. QA experts are the backbone of ensuring software quality. They possess a deep understanding of software systems, industry best practices, and testing methodologies. QA experts not only execute tests but also design comprehensive test strategies tailored to the specific project's needs. They meticulously plan test cases, considering various scenarios to catch even the most elusive bugs. Their knowledge extends beyond the surface, enabling them to think critically and creatively to identify potential issues. Furthermore, QA experts act as advocates for quality within the development team. They bridge the gap between developers and end-users, ensuring that software meets user expectations and functions flawlessly across different environments. In summary, the "Quality Assurance Expertise: The Foundation" section highlights the indispensable role QA experts play in delivering top-notch software products, their in-depth knowledge, meticulous planning, and their crucial role as champions of quality.   Exploratory Testing: A Dynamic Approach   Exploratory testing is a versatile and dynamic approach to software testing that relies on the intuition and adaptability of QA experts. In this section, we explore its key attributes and benefits. Dynamic and Intuitive Testing: Exploratory testing is not constrained by predefined test cases. QA experts use their domain knowledge and experience to interact with the software as end-users would. This dynamic and intuitive testing approach allows them to identify unexpected issues that scripted testing may miss. Real-World Scenario Simulation: Testers simulate real-world scenarios, making exploratory testing an excellent choice for uncovering usability issues, user experience concerns, and other subtle defects that can significantly impact user satisfaction. Adaptability: QA experts can adapt their testing strategies on the fly, reacting to what they discover during testing. This adaptability is invaluable when dealing with complex software systems that evolve rapidly. Creativity: Exploratory testing encourages creative thinking. Testers actively seek out scenarios that might not be evident in a predefined test plan, making it a powerful tool for finding unique bugs. Complexity Handling: This approach is particularly effective in identifying complex and intertwined defects that scripted testing might overlook. QA experts use their judgment to explore various pathways through the software, uncovering vulnerabilities. Documentation: While exploratory testing is less structured, it still involves detailed documentation of test scenarios, steps taken, and defects found. This documentation helps in communicating issues to development teams for resolution. Overall, the "Exploratory Testing: A Dynamic Approach" section highlights how exploratory testing leverages the expertise and creativity of QA experts to uncover subtle and complex software defects, making it an indispensable part of the quality assurance process.   Ad hoc Testing: The Unplanned Challenger   Ad hoc testing, on the other hand, is more spontaneous. It involves testers exploring the software without predefined test cases. This type of testing is often unstructured and relies on the tester's intuition and experience. Ad hoc testing is particularly useful when testers want to uncover unexpected issues quickly. Types of Bugs in Software Functional Bugs: These bugs strike at the core functionality of the software. They can lead to incorrect calculations, system crashes, or erratic behavior. In this section, we'll discuss examples of functional bugs, their causes, and how to prevent them. Usability Bugs: Usability bugs affect the user experience. They encompass issues related to user interface design, navigation, accessibility, and overall user-friendliness. We'll explore the importance of usability testing and how to detect and rectify usability bugs. Compatibility Bugs: Compatibility bugs emerge when software behaves differently on various platforms, browsers, or devices. Understanding these bugs is vital in ensuring a consistent user experience across diverse environments. We'll discuss compatibility testing techniques and best practices. Performance Bugs: Performance bugs can significantly impact software efficiency. They manifest as slow loading times, high resource consumption, or inefficient algorithms. In this section, we'll examine performance testing methodologies and tools to identify and rectify such bugs. Security Bugs: Security bugs pose a significant threat to software and its users. These vulnerabilities can lead to data breaches, unauthorized access, or other security breaches. We'll explore common security issues, such as SQL injection and cross-site scripting, and how to bolster software security. Regression Bugs: Regression bugs occur when previously functioning parts of the software break after a new update or change. We'll delve into regression testing strategies to prevent these bugs from sneaking into production releases. Data-related Bugs: Data-related bugs encompass issues with data validation, storage, or retrieval. These bugs can result in data corruption or loss. We'll discuss data testing techniques and best practices to safeguard data integrity. Concurrency Bugs: Concurrency bugs arise in multi-threaded or distributed systems. They can lead to race conditions, deadlocks, or data inconsistency. In this section, we'll explore techniques for identifying and resolving concurrency-related issues. Boundary Bugs: Boundary bugs occur at the edges of input ranges. Understanding these bugs is crucial to prevent buffer overflows, out-of-bounds memory access, or other vulnerabilities. We'll discuss strategies for boundary testing and mitigating boundary-related issues. Environmental Bugs: Environmental bugs crop up due to variations in system configurations or dependencies. We'll explore how testing in different environments can help uncover and address these bugs. By providing an in-depth exploration of these various bug types, this section equips readers with the knowledge needed to recognize, categorize, and address software defects effectively. It underscores the importance of thorough testing and quality assurance in delivering software that meets user expectations and functions flawlessly.   Exploratory Testing Tools   Session-Based Test Management (SBTM) Tools: SBTM tools are instrumental in managing and documenting exploratory testing sessions. They provide a structured framework for testers to plan, execute, and track their exploratory testing efforts. These tools help testers define session goals, document test charters, record session notes, and capture defects discovered during testing. Some popular SBTM tools include TestRail and qTest. Bug Tracking Systems: Bug tracking systems play a pivotal role in exploratory testing. Testers use these systems to log and manage defects they uncover during testing sessions. These systems facilitate seamless communication between QA teams and development teams. They help prioritize and track the resolution of identified issues, ensuring that no critical defects go unnoticed. Common bug-tracking systems include Jira, Bugzilla, and Redmine. Exploratory Testing Dashboards: Exploratory testing dashboards provide real-time visibility into ongoing testing sessions. They display key metrics such as the number of test charters completed, defects found, and session progress. These dashboards enable test managers and stakeholders to monitor the status of exploratory testing efforts and make informed decisions. Some testing tools offer built-in dashboards, while others integrate with third-party dashboard solutions. Test Case Management Tools: Although exploratory testing is less structured than scripted testing, some test case management tools offer features to support exploratory testing. These tools allow testers to create and organize test charters, document session notes, and link test charters to related requirements or user stories. They provide a centralized repository for exploratory testing documentation and findings. Collaboration and Communication Platforms: Effective communication and collaboration are vital in exploratory testing. Tools like Slack, Microsoft Teams, or dedicated testing communication platforms help testers share insights, discuss test charters, and quickly report defects to development teams. These platforms foster collaboration among testers, enabling them to learn from each other's experiences and best practices. Exploratory Testing Plugins and Extensions: Some testing tools offer plugins or extensions specifically designed for exploratory testing. These plugins enhance the testing process by providing features like session recording, screen capture, and annotation tools. Testers can use these extensions to document their testing sessions more effectively and capture evidence of defects. In summary, the "Exploratory Testing Tools" section highlights the critical role of tools in supporting and enhancing exploratory testing efforts. These tools streamline session management, defect tracking, communication, and documentation, ultimately helping QA experts uncover and report software issues efficiently and effectively. Choosing the right set of tools for your exploratory testing needs can significantly improve the quality assurance process and contribute to delivering high-quality software. Ad hoc Testing vs. Exploratory Testing Testing Objectives: Ad hoc Testing: Ad hoc testing is typically unplanned and focuses on identifying defects quickly. Testers may not have specific testing objectives in mind, and the primary goal is to discover issues spontaneously. Exploratory Testing: Exploratory testing, while also spontaneous, often has predefined testing goals or charters. Testers aim to explore specific aspects of the software, making it more structured compared to ad hoc testing. Testing Approach: Ad hoc Testing: Ad hoc testing is more random and unstructured. Testers use their intuition and experience to interact with the software without following predefined test cases. Exploratory Testing: Exploratory testing is systematic and goal-oriented. Testers have a rough plan or charter that guides their exploration. They may follow a specific testing strategy based on the software's complexity and requirements. Testing Scenarios: Ad hoc Testing: Ad hoc testing often involves testers simulating real-world user interactions without adhering to predefined scripts. It's ideal for quickly identifying issues in a dynamic environment. Exploratory Testing: Exploratory testing includes focused exploration of specific scenarios or features, which may be driven by requirements or user stories. Testers aim to uncover both expected and unexpected issues. Documentation: Ad hoc Testing: Ad hoc testing tends to have minimal documentation. Testers may take notes informally during testing but may not follow a strict documentation process. Exploratory Testing: Exploratory testing encourages testers to document their test charters, session notes, and defects in a more structured manner. This documentation aids in sharing findings and tracking progress. Testing Effectiveness: Ad hoc Testing: Ad hoc testing is effective in quickly identifying obvious defects, making it a valuable technique for rapid issue detection. Exploratory Testing: Exploratory testing is effective in uncovering both subtle and complex defects that may not be apparent in scripted testing. It provides a more thorough examination of the software. Usage in Testing Lifecycle: Ad hoc Testing: Ad hoc testing is often used informally during the early stages of testing or for quick spot checks. It's especially useful when time is limited. Exploratory Testing: Exploratory testing can be used throughout the testing lifecycle, from initial test planning to regression testing. It's adaptable to various testing phases. Team Collaboration: Ad hoc Testing: Ad hoc testing may require less collaboration as it's often performed individually or spontaneously. Exploratory Testing: Exploratory testing benefits from collaboration among testers to share insights, best practices, and testing strategies, especially when testing complex systems. In summary, the "Ad hoc Testing vs. Exploratory Testing" section highlights the differences in objectives, approach, structure, and documentation between these two testing methodologies. While ad hoc testing is more spontaneous and ad-hoc, exploratory testing offers a structured yet flexible approach to uncovering software defects, making it suitable for a wide range of testing scenarios and phases. Understanding these differences can help QA teams choose the right testing approach for their specific needs. Conclusion In the world of software quality assurance, QA experts play a vital role in ensuring the reliability and functionality of software products. Understanding the nuances of exploratory testing and ad hoc testing, recognizing different types of software bugs, leveraging the right testing tools, and measuring testing metrics are essential for delivering high-quality software.     FAQs 1. What is the primary goal of exploratory testing? The primary goal of exploratory testing is to uncover unexpected defects and issues in software through intuitive and dynamic testing. 2. How does ad hoc testing differ from exploratory testing? Ad hoc testing is more spontaneous and unplanned, while exploratory testing is systematic and goal-oriented. 3. Why is it important to measure testing metrics in software testing? Measuring testing metrics helps evaluate the effectiveness of testing efforts, identify areas for improvement, and ensure the delivery of high-quality software. 4. What role do QA experts play in software development? QA experts are responsible for ensuring the quality and reliability of software products by conducting rigorous testing and adherence to best practices. 5. Can you recommend any specific tools for exploratory testing? Some popular tools for exploratory testing include Session-Based Test Management (SBTM) tools and bug-tracking systems. The choice of tool depends on your specific testing needs.   https://q-pros.com/online-test-request/...

Q-Pros prides itself in adopting top-level methodologies and test cases essential for the QA process. We make sure we recruit specialized quality engineers who can utilize their skills to improve software performance. In this article, we will investigate the specifics involving test cases. The definition, and why are they essential to QA (Quality Assurance). What are Test Cases?  In simple terms, a test case is implementing a scenario to measure aspects of the functionality and non-functionality of a specific software while applying a set of actions. This is done by actioning certain features of an application under specific conditions to ensure the desired result. A test case differs from test scripts, as test scripts are programs intended to test for certain codes responsible for certain aspects of functionality. Test cases involve a set of actions to be completed per the actual order of functionality planned for the application. So, it is safe to say that test cases are more inclusive than test scripts. The outcome of each test case step is intended to produce a pass or fail status, depending on the criteria being followed. One could measure an application’s security by establishing a test case where the elements being actioned are aligned with a security measure, like verifying that password or account authentication works well. Components of Test Cases:  Test case ID: any test case should have a distinct ID; this will help organizations keep track of the progress and reference scenarios accordingly. Test description: A description of the unit being tested and for what. Pre-Conditions: What should be implemented before conducting the test case. For example, having an account is a condition to measure security. Test Data: this includes the data being used to verify, input, and output data. List of steps to action: This includes a step-by-step representation of the order of actions needed to guarantee the implementation of the test. The Expected Result & Actual Result: After all actions and conditions are applied accordingly, an expected result should already be in mind (i.e., the desired outcome of the scenario). The expected result is then compared with the actual result, and from that, we assess whether it is a pass or a fail. Importance of Having Test Cases  Any client must know the potential of their product, and how specific they can get while using it and it still delivers expected results. Nowadays, developers are planning test cases ahead of time to keep their clients up to date with what to expect. By providing and planning test case scenarios, clients can pitch in and provide feedback on the test cases and get involved in the testing process. Test cases allow for more transparency and build trust between all parties involved. It strengthens the DevOps cycle by asserting firsthand cooperation between developers and testing experts. It opens the door for more innovation, as more test cases are implemented, the potential of the application is stretched even further to make sure it includes more aspects of use. With our expert team of QA testers, you can be sure every corner of your application is covered with top-level test cases. Know more about our list of services.   https://q-pros.com/online-test-request/...

The field of software testing is becoming increasingly competitive every day. Whether you’re planning to work in software QA or already in the field, you may want to consider getting a software testing certificate.   Q-Pros believes that the quality of an institution depends on the quality of its employees. That’s why we pride ourselves on testing excellence and adopting a robust quality assurance framework.   In this article, we will look at the top 5 software quality assurance certifications based on popularity and demand.   What is a Quality Assurance Certification?   A software quality assurance certification is an acknowledgment from a licensed institution to professionals in the field of software testing and QA that they have acquired and updated their set of skills in their domain. QA certifications include tests upon completion that assess and recognize members while adding to their basic knowledge.   Why Are Quality Assurance Certifications Important?   Acquiring QA certifications not only adds value to your resume, but it also elevates the level of quality of the entire industry. QA certifications help keep companies aligned with the latest updates in the field, delivering better quality to clients and upping the level of quality in services overall.   Most QA companies encourage and sometimes demand obtaining QA certifications to assist in profiling candidates to their respected projects based on their area of expertise.   It has become essential over the years for job seekers looking to obtain a position in quality assurance to be certified by a renowned organization that specializes in quality assurance and software testing training.   What are the Top Software Testing Quality Assurance Certifications?   There are many sources to obtain a QA certificate, they vary from one country to another and based on the standardized demands of each region. Nonetheless, having a certificate will always be a plus and would support your claim in achieving higher positions.   Here are the top 5 Quality Assurance Certificates: International Software Testing Qualifications Board (ISTQB)   One of, if not the most prominent certifications to obtain in the field is an ISTQB certification. This board certificate is accepted internationally and is granted anywhere in the world with a universal syllabus. It is applicable on three levels, foundational, advanced, and expert.   ISTQB laid the foundation and set the standards for software testers. The training program includes a heavy load of information that cover all aspects of the industry.   On the foundation level, candidates would be suggested to have not less than (6) months of practical experience but with no prerequisites. The advanced level would require a foundation level certificate and practical experience while the expert level would require an advanced certification and more extensive experience, which could suggest more than (6) years of practical knowledge.   Certified Test Engineer (CSTE)   A CSTE certification sets the foundations and standard requirements for software quality assurance qualifications. It includes components in the basic level of IT and Quality Control (QC).   CSTE brings about good career opportunities. It targets people looking to get started in business and improve their resumes.   To apply for a CSTE, you must have one of the following prerequisites alongside a minimum of more than (18) months of experience:   4-year degree from a recognized college + 2 years of experience 3-year degree from a recognized college + 3 years of experience 2-year degree from a recognized college + 4 years of experience (6) years of experience in the field   Certified Software Quality Analyst (CSQA)   This certificate targets people who are more advanced than CSTE, it takes a deeper dive into Quality Control and Quality Assurance.   Obtaining a CSQA certificate is conditioned to the same prerequisites as CSTE:   4-year degree from a recognized college + 2 years of experience 3-year degree from a recognized college + 3 years of experience 2-year degree from a recognized college + 4 years of experience (6) years of experience in the field   And such as CSTE, CSQA requires prior experience of (18) months before applying.   Certified Associate in Software Testing (CAST)   This certification requires no prior work experience as a prerequisite. CAST is perfect for beginners looking to take the first step on the technical side of QA and software testing. It gives candidates the chance to learn more about the foundational level of QA and QC and teaches applicants about the basic techniques used in the process.   To qualify for a CAST certificate, applicants must have one of the following:   3 or 4-year degree from are cognized college 2-year degree from are cognized college and 1+ year of experience 3 years in the field   Certified Manager of Software Quality (CMSQ)   This certificate is concerned with highly professional applicants who are knowledgeable with all the skills and talents of software testing and QA.   CMSQ applicants are proficient managers who are apple to lead QA teams and plan testing strategies.   Out of all the certifications on this list, CMSQ has the most challenging conditions for applying:   Candidates MUST have:   CSQA Certification Currently working in the field Take a manager’s level test   Candidates must also have one of the 3 prerequisites   BA from an accredited college with 4 years of experience in the QA field Associate degree with 6 years of experience 8+years of experience   What does a software QA manager do?   QA managers play a vital role in securing quality for clients. They organize and strategize QA plans and frameworks that utilize the most out of the QA team. They also produce quality control procedures and practices that improve profitability for business owners.   To know more about Quality Assurance, learn more about us, and request a service from via our online test request form. ...

Katalon Studio is one of the most known tools for automated testing. Testing engineers are becoming keener on using it for its multiple features and low-code approach. Katalon is used for testing Web interfaces, Windows desktop, mobile apps (on both IOS and Android), and APIs. It also provides recording options and analysis reports. Our automation experts at Q-Pros regard Katalon as a must-have to implement automated tests and integrate them within other testing channels and teams. In this article, we will give an overview of Katalon, its features, and integrated software. What is Katalon Studio? Katalon Studio is an automation testing software designed to build and reprocess automated tests for UI without code dependency. It was initially released in 2015 with a Selenium framework. Katalon Studio is an all-in-one platform for web, mobile, desktop, and API automated testing. Katalon is a low-code platform with integrated options to speed up SDLS processes. Is Katalon Studio open source? Katalon is not an open-source framework, but it is free and can be used to provide automated solutions for front-end web and mobile applications Katalon Studio Features Here is a list of some important Katalon Studio features: Web Testing – Katalon grants its users complete web testing solutions with inbuilt continuous delivery and continuous integration that is fully aligned with DevOps integrations. It offers an object spy utility to capture objects and examine their properties in detail. Native Katalon plugins integrate with bug tracking/project management tools like JIRA, Git, and Jenkins. API Testing – Unlike the market leader Selenium, Katalon allows you to test API without any additional integrations. With Katalon, testers can automate scripts, perform code inspection, and code snipping and debugging. Katalon guarantees a bigger coverage of test data by supporting all kinds of requests and cloud-sourced data like XLS, XML, and REST, SOPA 1.1/1.2 requests. Mobile Testing – Katalon offers a mobile testing experience that involves mobile Web, IOS, and Android apps, as well as hybrid apps. Tests can be performed locally or remotely with actual devices or simulators. The module also allows testing engineers to detect and store data providing a well-structured process that is easy to track back to on long-term projects. Desktop Testing – Katalon supports apps written on the following platforms: Universal Windows Platform (UWP), Windows Forms (WinForms), Windows Presentation Foundation (WPF), and Classic Windows (Win32). Katalon's features for desktops are Spy Windows Objects and Record Windows Action. Katalon TestOps – TestOps is a web-based application that integrates both tests and DevOps frameworks. It offers test planning features, test execution, and project management. It also integrates with CI/CD tools and other testing platforms. TestOps gives a full 360 scan of all testing activities, creating test reports and monitoring for testing quality. Katalon TestOps takes screenshots, videos, and test results and displays them as KPIs on its dashboard. Katalium – Kataluim feature is an open-source framework that offers a blueprint for test automation projects based on TestNG and Selenium. It streamlines building test cases and improves the user experience on Selenium Grid. Katalon Studio Integrations Katalon offers native integrations that makes it easier to work with common QA related tools. Here is a list of Katalon integrations: CI/CD: Azure DevOps, Jenkins, GitHub, Gitlab, Circle CI, CodeMagic, etc. ALM: Azure DevOps, Jira, Xray, qTest, TestRail, etc. Cross Browser Testing: BrowserStack, SauceLabs, Selenium Grid, etc. Testing platforms: Selenium, Selenium IDE, Postman, etc. Source code management: Atlassian Bitbucket, AWSCodeCommit, GitHub, etc. Learn more about Katalon integration Katalon vs Selenium   Katalon Selenium   Used for   Used on Mobile, Desktop, Web Applications   Web Applications   Difficulty   Easy to use with a dual interface   More Difficult Browser options   Chrome, Safari, Firefox, Microsoft Edge, Opera   Chrome, Safari, Firefox   Keywords Includes Built in keywords, and offers costume made keywords   No built-in keyword options   Reporting   Provides repots for recordings   No reporting Speed and processing   Fast   Faster than Katalon In Conclusion Katalon is good for both small-scale projects and big projects. It is a perfect choice for both individuals and companies as it offers a constantly evolving ecosystem of useful tools. It also comes with a wide list of native integrations to facilitate implementing all kinds of needed tests, including API testing. Q-Pros relies on Katalon, and we make sure our testing engineers are Katalon experts. This guides our QA specialties to guarantee excellent and accurate results for our clients.   https://q-pros.com/online-test-request/ ...

The need for faster time to market and superior quality is getting intense in the software development process. Organizations are reaping the benefits of the DevOps approach and are incorporating the rules within every aspect of software testing. This article provides insights into the concept of  DevOps  and how we at Q-Pros adapted the Role of QA into more dynamic and collaborative activities to best fit the DevOps team structure.  The main objectives of adopting DevOps are to make the testing and development process more collaborative, ensure  Software Quality Testing, and help launch applications faster to the market. New-age applications need real-time changes and updates to meet the growing demands of the end-users. That requires continuous development, continuous testing, and continuous delivery/deployment. The DevOps approach enables teams to constantly upgrade and deliver. Every enterprise and its style of working differs. The way they would adopt DevOps will be different too. Digital transformation and the need to be always available for end-users with the latest updates are transforming the way enterprises adopt new practices and methodologies. Every enterprise must evolve sustainably, so quality is at the core of every practice, including DevOps.     In a DevOps scenario, QA integrates into the testing and development process and takes the collaborative approach, and both testing and development teams are responsible for it. In the traditional method, QA creeps in toward the end, whereas in DevOps, it comes in at every level. As for code development, the QA team pushes the new development code into production, and DevOps facilitates to ensure a seamless deployment of infrastructure and tools. Thus, it helps in releasing a code consistently. The responsibility to ensure quality is not only limited to closing bugs but covers the entire production process.  Web mobile applications  such as electronic services, e-commerce, or financial services applications need to be updated frequently. It is a fundamental business requirement. DevOps helps make this possible, but with QA involved, the quality of the release is guaranteed. The reality check can happen in real time rather than taking the code offline and testing it.  Overall, the popularity of DevOps over the years has intertwined quality into every engineer’s responsibility. DevOps helps in addressing the needs of the market and ensures that end-users do not suffer. QA further enables and directs teams to check the application for  performance  and quality before it is up for delivery.    The role of QA in the current software development process is changing, where the end-user comes into focus, and their needs are brought into perspective while delivering the application. Releasing new and functional updates at any point through the application’s life cycle can become a disaster if the quality is not ensured constantly. Automation of tests plays a critical role in guaranteeing quality and bringing speed to the release process.  Building a QA strategy with the necessary best practices is essential for organizations embracing the DevOps movement. Establishing a solid QA strategy will help deliver effective software development and operations to achieve user experience. DevOps practices are adopted to improve the regularity of the releases and reduce defects. It is a methodology that boosts rapid, short, iterative development and deployment of applications.  So, the goal of incorporating QA is to ensure continuous improvement in the delivery process. DevOps allows digital enterprises to meet the needs of the competition and enable overall business growth. As a result, enterprises can streamline and pace up the delivery of applications with changes and innovation. The disconnect between QA and DevOps often occurs due to misconceptions about the role of quality assurance in the modern software development life cycle. Even as continuous integration servers and continuous delivery practices check your code for errors, they do not ensure its quality when you define quality from your end user’s perspective rather than your code’s: “Quality is fitness for your end-user purpose.”   We at Quality Professionals have implemented a criterion to verify the quality of the build and ensure no bugs get pushed to production: Code Review Test Automation Deploy to Staging Comprehensive QA Checklist Our test engineers have experience working on team collaboration platforms such as Azure DevOps,  JIRA, and  HP ALM, Leveraging the integration with market-leading  DevOps Automation Tools.    Q-Pros provides efficient testing services to clients on a global scale. We strive to deliver remarkable outcomes that guarantee error-free applications. Learn more about us and request a custom-made testing service through our online service form.   https://q-pros.com/online-test-request/ ...