testing services Archives | Page 5 of 8 | Independent Testing Company

02Jun

Top 7 Automated Tools for Software Testing in 2023

In this day and age, automation of services is becoming a necessity to scale up production,whether it be in terms of speed, accuracy, or simply to offer an easier solutionfor average users.Software testing has always been a fast-shifting industry. Developers and software providersContinue to look for ways to create suitable AI solutions to base the testing processes from all angles on an automated tools foundation. As a testing service provider, Q-Pros relies on a heavy arsenal of software and tools to aid us in our QA process and to provide ultimate results for our clients. In this article, we will list the market-leading automation tools to use in 2023. Here is a top 7 list (in no order) of the best-automated tools for software testing in 2023: 1. Katalon StudioKatalon Studio is an automation software testing tool that allows its users to build test scriptswithout code. Katalon offers a list of plugins and sub-tools that benefit the overall testing process,and the platform works with Java scripting languages.Katalon Studio supports data-driven and behavior-driven approaches and CI/CD integration. Thetool can be used for exploratory testing allowing rapid feedback.Katalon Studio offers a great deal of pre-built coding templates to make it easier forbeginners and experienced testers. You can take advantage of its auto-completion, codeinspection, and auto-formatting features during execution.Katalon can be used for web, desktop, API, and mobile testing. It provides an excellentdocumenting service and is suitable for all environments, including Windows, Mac OS, and Linux. 2. AutifyAutify is an automated tools that offers a no-code testing service for web and mobileapplications. It is considered one of the simplest test automation tools available as it allows you tocreate test scenarios by simply using and interacting with the application as if you were an average user.It also offers parallel test execution to work on tests on more than one component simultaneously.Autify allows running multiple cross-browser tests at the same time, and its AI-based frameworkautomatically updates any test case if a change occurs.Autify integrates with bug-tracking tools like Jenkins, TestRail, Slack, and many more. 3. MablMabl is a low-code automation testing platform that gives you the ability to create and executefunctional tests and API integration suites from a single platform.During test execution, Mabl provides diagnostic data and feedback on failed tests, and an AI powered auto-healing system to learn from previous tests.Mabl uses user experience scenarios and integrates automated end-to-endtesting to the entire development process and CI/CD. 4. KobitonKobiton is a cloud-based mobile testing platform that offers manual, automated, and visualtesting options for mobile applications on Android and IOS. Services can be non-scripted orscripted using its AI-assisted script tool.Kobi ton's specialty is that it allows you to run complete device labs using local devices and privateand public cloud devices, as well as offering testers the ability to run tests in paralleland concurrently running multiple tests.Unlike the previous market leaders in mobile testing, such as Appium, Kobiton allows you torun scriptless automated tools tests and gives you the ability to transform manual tests into simpleautomated tests. 5. TestGridTestGrid is a testing platform that can run on cloud or local spaces. The platform offers testingservices for mobile apps and websites.It also provides you with a no-code automation testing option and an auto-healing technology thatworks with Selenium and Appium scripts.TestGrid is an adaptable platform, meaning it offers its users the ability to reuse tests ondifferent versions of the app without needing to rewrite test cases from scratch. The platform alsooffers parallel testing features to allow testers to test in bulk. 6. Cucumber (Supported by SmartBear)Cucumber is a behavior-driven development (BDD) automation testing tool. It allows you to writetest scenarios in natural language to ease the testing process for beginners and users with noextensive programming skills.Cucumber is considered one of the simplest testing tools for automation, and its featurefiles are easy to use for both users and primary stakeholders. It is a useful tool to enablecommunication for BAs, developers, designers, QA analysts, and end-users.The platform is open-source and comes with free services and paid plans. 7.IBM RationalTest WorkbenchIBM's Rational Test Workbench is a testing tool that offers functional testing, integrationtesting, and API testing services. It uses virtual components to discover errors in the preliminarystages.IBM's Rational Test Workbench supports DevOps and can integrate with other platforms to facilitatethe testing process for Web, Mobile, and desktop applications.Rational Test Workbench makes it simple for users to run automated tests by offering code-freeauthoring and storyboard testing for functional and regression testing, mixing natural languagetests, and visual editing.The platform uses Script Assure to adapt to frequent user interface changes and constant systemupdates, as well as allowing you to reuse objects through its object repository.The platform also offers a scriptless performance testing service using automatic management ofrobust service responses that speed up the delivery of performance testing groups. Find out more about us and request a testing service through our online request form...

30May

What is Visual testing?

by q-pros

in software testing

Comments

In this article, we will learn about a type of software testing known as Visual Testing. We will investigate the various subjects surrounding this testing approach and how we at Q-Pros adopt its various methods to guarantee excellent results. What is Visual testing?"Visual Testing" is observing an application’s visible output while monitoring for visual bugs and assessing the output in comparison to what is expected by demand. Examining an application's interface is done during the production period by developers, and later end-to-end users (a person who intend to use a product) will seal the deal with the product in the final stages. The front-end developer’s main concern is to make sure that an application looks good on all browsers and devices with no obvious defects in terms of appearance. HTML and CSS as well as JS are interchangeable and can behave differently from one platform to another. This causes the risk of errors that not only affect appearance but also the functionality. Considering such concerns, Visual testing is highly demanded by clients as a major step in QA (Quality Assurance).The distinct value of Visual TestingTesting your application's script and making sure each input delivers an expected output on a basic level is not enough. Changes regarding layout and interface could occur due to a lack of compatibility. Certain elements such as height, width, background color, font style, font size, and position within screen coordinates could change from one platform to another. This change is a result of different operating systems using various rendering methods.Developers need to have their code written in a way that includes all previous versions of script input. Tools such as Babel could ease up the process by re-writing a code to make sure it could be rendered by all browsers in the same way. Cross-browser testing is a different approach with similar objectives. It includes other aspects than visual ones and focuses on how an application behaves in various browsers, making sure an application is operating based on business requirements and has achieved the desired quality level on all available browsers.Manual Visual Testing Vs Automatic Visual Testing Manual Visual Testing Manual Visual Testing involves testing an application by sheer observation through usage and excavating any notes or anomalies that might stick out. This form of testing is becoming less popular because it is time-consuming. To put it in perspective, testing an application "manually" will require testing it on all available browsers, in all operating systems, and taking into consideration, available devices and different screen configurations and screen displays. This will take a lot of time to accomplish, and it will open room for false readings. Automated Visual Testing In Automated Visual Testing, developers use tools and software to automate the test process and compare visual elements across different screen combinations. Automated tools such as Selenium or Appium ease the process by running the script and creating UI variations. As good as it may seem to have all screen combinations generated automatically, it still leaves the burden of testing it yourself to check for any bugs or defects. One way to make things even easier is to rely on a method called Snapshot Testing.In short, Snapshot testing creates a bitmap of multiple screen combinations and compares pixels, reporting/highlighting any unexpected changes in color hex code. By comparing each pair of pixels in combination A & combination B, a snapshot test highlighted the difference as shown in the third table. The Issue with Automated Visual Testing and The Snapshot Method: As good as it may seem, Automated Visual testing is not perfect. While companies are relying on automated means of visual testing, the need for manual observation is essential.Rendering will always cause deference – Relying on an algorithm to detect differences is almost redundant, as the algorithm will always report bugs. This is because pixels do not represent visual elements. Certain rendering activities include algorithms that create pixel differences to run a script. Encountering some differences on a UI level does not always translate to bugs – some operating systems/browsers adjust CSS codes in a way that is seen as suitable. For Example, Minor changes may occur to the text based on the browser being used. /*! elementor - v3.20.0 - 26-03-2024 */.elementor-heading-title{padding:0;margin:0;line-height:1}.elementor-widget-heading .elementor-heading-title[class*=elementor-size-]>a{color:inherit;font-size:inherit;line-height:inherit}.elementor-widget-heading .elementor-heading-title.elementor-size-small{font-size:15px}.elementor-widget-heading .elementor-heading-title.elementor-size-medium{font-size:19px}.elementor-widget-heading .elementor-heading-title.elementor-size-large{font-size:29px}.elementor-widget-heading .elementor-heading-title.elementor-size-xl{font-size:39px}.elementor-widget-heading .elementor-heading-title.elementor-size-xxl{font-size:59px}Benefits of Visual Testing Visual Testing offers a multitude of advantages: Improved User Experience: By identifying visual inconsistencies and UI defects, Visual Testing ensures a polished and user-friendly experience for everyone.Early Defect Detection: Visual bugs can be caught early in the development cycle, leading to faster and more cost-effective fixes.Reduced Maintenance Costs: Consistent visual appearance across platforms minimizes the need for rework and maintenance efforts later in the development process.Faster Release Cycles: Automated Visual Testing can be integrated into CI/CD pipelines, enabling faster release cycles with the confidence of a visually sound product.Peace of Mind: Visual Testing provides developers and stakeholders with the assurance that the software's visual presentation aligns with design expectations. The Future of Visual Testing Visual Testing is poised for further evolution: Machine Learning Integration: Machine learning algorithms can be employed to analyze visual data and automatically identify potential UI issues.Self-Healing UIs: Imagine UIs that can self-adjust for optimal display across different devices. Visual Testing combined with AI could pave the way for such advancements.Focus on Accessibility: Visual Testing will likely play a bigger role in ensuring UIs are accessible to users with visual impairments.Q-ProsVisual testing is a field that co-exists with a lot of other non-functional testing methods; it is an inseparable need of QA. At Q-Pros We run scripts on various scenarios to make sure the script runs well on all available platform combinations. We rely on automated tools as well as manually checking visual elements via a team of QA experts....

mobile app testing techniques, functional testing and non functional testing, bugs in software testing

23May

Understanding Bugs in Software Testing

by q-pros

in QA Tips

Comments

The objective of QA activities is to find and detect defects and ensure fulfillment of requirements as desired by stakeholders. We at Q-Pros put this on the top of our priorities when serving our clients. In this article, we will investigate bugs in software Testing, what are the criteria followed to report a bug, the terminology used, and why we get bugs? To start, let us look at the definition of bugs in a software system. Definition of “Bugs in Software Testing” A bug is a way to define a certain defect that is blocking an application to work as required. Finding bugs can be defined as the main objective of the entire testing process. Bugs might be caused due to several kinds of mistakes made by developers in the development phase. Types of Bugs in Software Testing Bugs are segregated into categories based on casualty as such: · Coding Error: A bug caused due to a mistake in the coding phase (Internal mistakes). · Design Error: A bug caused due to a designer’s mistake, these bugs could cause issues in functionality and behavior. · New suggestion: This type of bug is concerned with enhancement. A testing expert would suggest a change rather than a severe fix. · Documentation issue: Documentation issues could cause ambiguity and misunderstanding amongst involved developing teams. Which in turn results in bugs and defects. · Hardware problem: Bugs caused by hardware issues interfering with the application of the software. Types Of Bug Severity In order to prioritize QA efforts, we separate bugs in terms of severity. Bugs in Software Testing are defined based on effect level into the following types: · Blocker: Blocks a certain function or test to be actioned. · Critical: Causes system crash and major loss of data. · Major: Causes a huge abnormality of function. · Minor: Causes a small/minor loss of function. · Trivial: UI enhancements required. · Enhancement: A suggestion for a certain change or modification. - Using Jira as a bug-tracking tool Jira is an open-source tool that is used for bug tracking, project management, and issue tracking in manual testing. It offers services and features that include reporting, recording, and workflow. Jira is a prominent project management tool that is easy to use and works best for projects that require multiple teams and levels of involvement. Characteristics of a Valid Bug (Bug Criteria) Reporting defects can be trickier than you would think. For us to consider a bug valid for reporting, it must follow a certain criterion. First, a Bugs in Software Testing should be unique and have its own unique ID, this means that we cannot relate to more than one defect regardless of how close they are in the scope of application. Then you must consider the fact that bugs should be reproducible, meaning that more than one tester can get the same bug when following the same steps leading to that bug. Thirdly you should dedicate as much time as possible to make sure that the bug report is clear and cohesive and can be transferred from one team to another to get the issue fixed. - Read Also “Mobile App Testing Checklist for a Defect Free App” Where do Bugs come from? There are several reasons why we get bugs in Bugs in Software Testing. The top two factors of bugs immerging are: · Poor communication Communication during the development stages is highly significant and is a key factor in project management. Post-production bugs come about due to miscommunication which leads to ambiguity, meaning that there was an unclear or misunderstood transfer of information during the initial stages of requirement planning and design on what the software is required to do. · Programmer’s mistake Programmers might make mistakes during the coding phase, which will most certainly open the door to several bugs and defects. Testing experts have methods to check internally to root out the cause of a defect from the source code directly. Learn more about software testing approaches at Q-Pros and request a service via our online test request....

15May

Codeless Testing – Automated Testing & Tools

by q-pros

in News & Topics

Comments

In this article, we will get to know more about a term commonly used in the QA (Quality Assurance) world. It is associated with automated means of testing a product. Codeless testing, or codeless automated testing, provides solutions for developers and testers by ensuring everybody’s involvement in the testing process regardless of their level of technical knowledge. So, what is Codeless testing? What are the specifics of implementing codeless automated tests? And how we at Q-Pros take advantage of such practices to ensure better and more guaranteed results for our clients. What is Codeless automated testing? Codeless automated testing is a type of testing that involves no writing of code. It allows teams to automate writing tests without the need for code-writing skills. By relieving the testers from the time-consuming code/scriptwriting process required in many manual code-based tests, Codeless Automation allows for more time within the Dev-Ops cycle, accelerates the software development lifecycle (SDLC), and channels more energy toward development and innovation for developers and testers alike. Codeless vs Code-based Testing By distinguishing testing approaches based on code usage/dependency, we produce terms such as low-code, no-code, and code-based testing. These terms are regarded as frameworks adopted by testing experts based on the business needs and requirements. Some products require simple forms of testing by following the logic of use. These approaches require little-to-no-code knowledge, while other more complex forms of testing rely extensively on script knowledge. Codeless Code-based Little to no coding skill Requires strong coding skills ~ Less than an hour a test ~ 5 to 6 hours per test Relies on self-handling tools Proactive in nature Tested on web and mobile Mobile native (Appium) & desktop web (Selenium) Test scenarios are flow-based Test scenarios are page-based When to use Codeless testing? To achieve top-quality results, any organization should ensure a healthy balance of code-based & codeless testing methods. Not all tests can be done via codeless means, some tests are too complex, and unpredictable, and it would be impossible to get accurate results without a hefty use of code. Certain tests for behavior for example are difficult to test for using codeless automation methods. An application being blocked on certain devices, or cases where different results are erupting irregularly. In the QA world, tests are segregated based on objective, and by understanding the required goal of the test, one can choose a testing method that is fitting for the mission at hand. Rather than scanning all aspects of an application using one code-based methodology, relying on codeless testing first-hand regarding certain aspects saves a lot of time. Components, features, and approach. Selenium is an open-source medium used for automated testing. It provided companies with a good ROI (Return on Investment) in their projects by accelerating the testing process. While companies relied on Selenium for automated testing, Selenium offered a component that allows the recording, editing, and debugging of functional tests, called Selenium IDE (Integrated development environment). Selenium IDE recorded testing steps and later provided the option to convert these testing steps into a programming language. Basic features for Selenium IDE: Allows test case reuse via the Run command. Provides automation cross-browser testing using the Selenium SIDE runner. Supports a mix of commanding options like loops and raise asserts. Runs a specific test or a testing suite. Records scripts, which can be later accessed manually for editing. Its benefits can be extended using plug-ins (Third-party services provided by Selenium). Another highly-ranked automation tool that offers a codeless feature is Katalon Studio. It is described as simple to use with unique features. Basic features for Katalon Studio: Very minimal coding skills are required. Built-in test case libraries, project templates, and keywords. It allows for recording and playback. Used for API, desktop, and mobile. Allows for the use of plug-ins. Many other tools that are unique in features are provided for test experts to make use of. Software development companies are adding and enhancing versions of their testing applications so that they can offer faster and easier ways of testing more efficiently. These innovative tools not only benefit testing experts or developers but also provide a sense of comfort for clients looking for better results. Codeless Automation using Cloud By utilizing cloud technology, we can speed up the testing process even more. Removing the supervising human user from the process and making sure that every aspect of an application is tested. Several benefits include: Adjusting workload as needed automatically. Automation on a cloud test for scalability easily without the need for hardware. Cloud automation testing can be accessed anywhere, anytime. Security is provided by the cloud provider. Cloud automation meets robust requirements. Q-pros is a leading Quality assurance company, with years of experience, we managed to stay ahead of the curve in all state-of-the-art testing utilities. You can request our automation testing services via our list of offers. By reducing limitations, Codeless testing strengthened the cooperation between the developing team, testing team, and clients/end-users. This enriches the Dev-Ops cycle and in return guarantees better results and cost-effectiveness. ...

12May

QA Fundamentals: Introducing Test Cases

by q-pros

in News & Topics

Comments

Q-Pros prides itself in adopting top-level methodologies and test cases essential for the QA process. We make sure we recruit specialized quality engineers who can utilize their skills to improve software performance. In this article, we will investigate the specifics involving test cases. The definition, and why are they essential to QA (Quality Assurance). What are Test Cases? In simple terms, a test case is implementing a scenario to measure aspects of the functionality and non-functionality of a specific software while applying a set of actions. This is done by actioning certain features of an application under specific conditions to ensure the desired result. A test case differs from test scripts, as test scripts are programs intended to test for certain codes responsible for certain aspects of functionality. Test cases involve a set of actions to be completed per the actual order of functionality planned for the application. So, it is safe to say that test cases are more inclusive than test scripts. The outcome of each test case step is intended to produce a pass or fail status, depending on the criteria being followed. One could measure an application’s security by establishing a test case where the elements being actioned are aligned with a security measure, like verifying that password or account authentication works well. Components of Test Cases: Test case ID: any test case should have a distinct ID; this will help organizations keep track of the progress and reference scenarios accordingly. Test description: A description of the unit being tested and for what. Pre-Conditions: What should be implemented before conducting the test case. For example, having an account is a condition to measure security. Test Data: this includes the data being used to verify, input, and output data. List of steps to action: This includes a step-by-step representation of the order of actions needed to guarantee the implementation of the test. The Expected Result & Actual Result: After all actions and conditions are applied accordingly, an expected result should already be in mind (i.e., the desired outcome of the scenario). The expected result is then compared with the actual result, and from that, we assess whether it is a pass or a fail. Importance of Having Test Cases Any client must know the potential of their product, and how specific they can get while using it and it still delivers expected results. Nowadays, developers are planning test cases ahead of time to keep their clients up to date with what to expect.By providing and planning test case scenarios, clients can pitch in and provide feedback on the test cases and get involved in the testing process. Test cases allow for more transparency and build trust between all parties involved. It strengthens the DevOps cycle by asserting firsthand cooperation between developers and testing experts. It opens the door for more innovation, as more test cases are implemented, the potential of the application is stretched even further to make sure it includes more aspects of use. With our expert team of QA testers, you can be sure every corner of your application is covered with top-level test cases. Know more about our list of services. Request a Service ...